Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
A jam submission

Opr mission jam - Rift's seedsView project page

Submitted by Andracifus — 7 hours, 18 minutes before the deadline
Add to collection

Play book

Opr mission jam - Rift's seeds's itch.io page

Results

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Adherence to Theme#193.5363.536
Rules Clarity#243.3573.357
Overall#263.3693.369
Concepts & Originality#483.2143.214

Ranked from 28 ratings. Score is adjusted from raw score by the median number of ratings per game in the jam.

Leave a comment

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

Comments

Host

Hello, thank you for participating in the first OPR Mission Jam! Please email marketing@onepagerules.com so that we can send you the participation models! Please include 'OPR Mission Jam Participation Minis' in the subject line.

Submitted

A simple mission with a good application of the theme. Could use a little more editing for clarity. Good work!

Submitted (1 edit)

Having a minimum of 10 piece of terrain doesnt cover a 6'x4' well.

The Dangerous terrain aura special rule is a bit janky. On paper prefectly written, actually playing it will be a slight issue. 

Developer

I usually play with 10 piece of terrain and it's well covered. But my club had big terrains, so I'm certainely biased.

The few times i see the dangerous terrain special rule, it's a little piece of terrain easy to dodge, i wanted to try something where we are forced to walk in. Maybe bad for competitive but with potential for narrative.

Submitted

need to say large pieces of terrain in this case, because barriercades, are scatter terrain, they are still pieces of terrain. 

The issues with the rules, is that requires a lot of measuring, and the start point of the measurement is going to change between the two players. Naturally it would be from the center of the object, but alot of time its not prefect, and it can change the outcome. It's not overly a huge issues, just a consideration

Developer

Yeah, you're right. I will keep that in mind for next time, thanks.