Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

The Anger is justified, but please direct it in a useful direction

A topic by Siegmernes created Jul 24, 2025 Views: 24,470 Replies: 175
Viewing posts 21 to 40 of 50 · Next page · Previous page · First page · Last page
(+7)

What happens next time when credit card companies say they won't take payment from websites that sell games with gay characters? Or games with violence? Or games with any cursing? If you cave in at the first sign of pressure, you're opening the door for something even worse in the future. Itch bowing down without putting up any fight, even going so far as to remove non-NSFW games that just featured gay people is a disgrace and they absolutely are at fault.

(+3)

Actually it's on the puritan association roadmap, games like GTA or Detroit : Become Human are namely targeted.

(+1)

What irks me is that they say it's about this game called "No Mercy." I can understand if the game itself violated the TAC on the site where it was posted, but even then, Itch and Steam could have just delisted THAT GAME. This is an extreme overreaction and has shown that outside companies and interest groups can bully them into dictating what consumers can legally and consentually consume with their own money. Yes, it is the payment systems and those who manage them that are at fault here. However, to give in to the pressure like this without warning makes it feel like they are just giving up without a fight. Most of the games that were delisted didn't violate the Terms; you need an account even to download NSFW games, which requires age verification; and we, as consumers, can either just not buy the game or, if it does violate something, report it. These creators have Freedom of Speech, and consumers, adult consumers at that,  have the right to make a legal and informed purchase. 

(+2)

I can agree with that: Itch is a victim, maybe not a martyr... but still a victim.

My enemy is all what allows to payment providers to choke our rights.

Even if we abandon itch, the same can happen anywhere else, and in future not only to games.

So we don't have to fight among us, but rather against our real enemies

(+7)

I disagree. Itch could have told Visa (or whoever else) to go pound sand and found a new payment processor. Paypal, Stripe, Venmo, Cashapp. Hell a crypto payment processor like CoinGate?

Taking down the game was a betrayal of their community. The whole purpose of Itch is to support indie devs. They let big brother stomp on one of their own.

They then went above and beyond that and basically shadowbanned their entire NSFW collection of games. That's not just bad, that's twirl-your-mustache villainous.

(+7)

The payment providers is the bad guy, yes. But Itch still runs this website, not a credit card company.

Itch made the decision to stomp on an indie dev because it was convenient for them to do so.

If they didn't, they'd be stomping on many more indie devs. If you want to call that convenient... sure, I won't argue with you.

(+5)

This won't be the end of it. Now that it worked once, they know it works and they're going to attack more games.

(+2)

Yes, absolutely, and we should prepare to fight back, not just for those at risk, but also those who have been affected.

Targeting Itch about this would be unproductive. That's all I'm saying.

(+2)

If Itch doesn't change payment processors then I think there is merit to abandoning Itch and starting up a new platform that uses crypto for payment.

(+2)

Fight back when Itch itself already gave up ^^

All indies will be stomped the moment daddy bankster and mommy puritan will demand it now.

Yeah, yeah, Itch aren't the bad guys, they just follow the orders, they had no choice, yadi yada... I heard that so many times before...

(+10)

Dude the fact they nuke all nfsw games it's enough to question the platform and even get angry. Yes, I understand they were pressured by paid platforms, but not even Steam did what itch.io did. They nuke all games Without thinking twice.

It's as if they took the easy way out, instead of reviewing the NFSW games on the platform. And if that's the case, it means  that the tedious reviews  that NFSW games go through before they're released have been useless all this time.

They didn't nuke all NSFW games. They're just hidden while they're reviewing games. Most of the games are still there, but you can't search them at the moment. You can, however, interact with the game's page via a link.

(+3)

"They're just hidden while they're reviewing games"that's exactly what I mean with nuke.  I know that most games are still here. But the fact But the fact that they were all hidden is questionable at best. Do previous itch.io reviews hold no weight? Were all the NFSW games previously reviewed by itch.io allowed without proper authorization? or itch.io just took the easy way out and hide/nuke all games (That's not counting the games that were permanently removed.).

Well, first of all, hiding content is a very detached concept from "nuking" it.

Second, this situation is more complicated than that. With the pressure from payment processors, Itch needs to be more careful. Many of the games being targeted and removed are done so based on some of the fetishes associated with them. This is due to Collective Shout, a puritan group that has been influencing payment processors to disallow content they disagree with from being sold.

I would assume that NSFW games being hidden is being done in order to protect themselves and developers while they sort everything out with said payment providers.

(+3)

First, dude you're really arguing about the definition of nuke? i hope you know that the term "nuke" real definition is different from what you and i are using it. and the way you and i use it is more in line with the "urban" use of it.

second, my point still stand. Are you consciously or subconsciously ignoring the fact that Steam went through the same pressure and didn't decide to "nuke" all adult games? 

Again, is incredible to think that the previus itch.io system of reviewing games don't have any weight, and they have to resort to hiding/nuke all the nfsw games.

(+1)

I am arguing against the use of the word. When people hear about something getting "nuked", they assume people mean that it got deleted, which is not the case here. The clarification is important to avoid blatant misinformation. The literal definition does not matter.

Your insistence to use the word feels like a rhetoric intentionally for the purpose of antagonizing Itch.

Itch and Steam are not the same. Steam is owned by Valve. Itch is indie. There are plenty of ways this could change how each handles moderation. Truthfully, I don't know how they function, but I don't expect that you do either. If I am correct to expect that, I believe it is unreasonable to criticize Itch for a situation you do not understand. Moreover, I feel like your frustrations are misplaced and that they should be directed toward those that have forced this decision to be made in the first place.

With all that said I'm done. This has been a headache.

(+3)

First, you don't decide how I speak/express myself. If there's any confusion with what I say, I'm willing to explain myself. Now again, this isn't the same as you telling me how I speak, especially when my way of speaking is valid (it's incredible that you're ignoring the actual definition of nuke to maintain your narrative).

Second, based on your second paragraph, it seems you have no idea how itch.io moderation works. I have a surprise for you. I do have an idea, because I'm a developer of NSFW games on this platform, and every game that enters itch.io goes through a review before being indexed.

Every NSFW developer who wants to publish a game here has to follow a number of strict rules before appearing in searches. And even then, they have to promote their game independently because itch.io doesn't offer much support for small developers.

So, after all those reviews, to find that itch.io decided to hide all the NFSW games without taking into account all the rules they previously established is at least questionable.

Dude, it's incredible that you're so confident about something without any information on the subject.

(+2)

Heck, I was tempted to give in and respond to this properly for a moment.

You're not worth arguing with. Pretend like you got me, or whatever makes you feel good about yourself.


(+4)

They're not just "hidden," they have been and are continuing to be yeeted into the void.

(1 edit) (+2)

we should all make games that claim to be sexual but have absolutely 0 sexual .. or like pretend like food is sexual or something.

... like people say cars are sexy ....

(+2)

Itch should have given a hint, with some time to be prepared, not just a sudden punch...

(+12)

“Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it.”

Mark Twain

(1 edit) (+12)

If itch.io was on our side, then they would give clear directions to everyone on the site how to fight this. I.e. which petitions to sign, who to contact, how to get our voices heard. Did we get that? No. We got a spineless response that they're "cleaning up shop" (i.e. throwing the baby out with the bathwater).


So is itch the good guys? Are they on our side? No. We got a single emoji announcement from them on discord. Well I've got one for you too, itch.

(+10)

"Itch is not the bad guy in this Situation." ...they're just carrying out orders....

the Nazi soldier defense, classic.

(+3)

this is why these sites should start integrating other payment options like upi, there's no way in hell any retarded lobyist group can pressure all upi service providers

(+1)

No it is.

(+6)

Since this is action is a proxy attack on human rights of LGBT+ community - compliance with it makes you a bad guy. 

(+6)

Itch IS the bad guy.

They could have gone crypto or something else. But that would give them less profit I guess.
But at the very least they could have people keep games they paid for.

(+8)

zero resitance, borderline obeying in advance

stop defending the poor poor assholes that readily chose to do this the moment it was demanded

(+5)

What's fascinating is the fact that Itch and its defenders actually think that censorship will stop here.

Hope you're ready for Itch being an off-brand Steam ^^

I wonder how many month before Itch become the Tumblr of video games.

(+5)

Let's start mass reporting bible games, considering that Holy Bible features rape and incest themes in it. 2 can play this game, you zealots

CALL THEM. Do not e-mail them. They'll just scrape it for keywords and let an AI give a canned answer.

Viewing posts 21 to 40 of 50 · Next page · Previous page · First page · Last page