More A.I responses huh?

 When I speak of real artists I speak of humans. Humans with creativity and passion. Art is a deeply human form of expression. and to be able to express art in any capacity is what I consider talent. A.I. Slop is not art. You are correct in saying that art has always expanded to include new voices new tools and methods, the thing is, up until not long ago, those methods were are still deeply human in workflow and production. Things crafted by humans. Even the continued evolution and iterations of methodology itself was still deeply human. 

In other words, Yes. I do speak confidently, And I do judge and evaluate who has a voice on here
Humans do
Not algorithms

Ai "Art" is theft in more ways than one. It steals attention, jobs, resources and financing from real human artists. Not only that, AI doesn't create in the way a human would. Instead, it compiles premade human works without permission or credit, and the algorithm creates an image using that as a base. Currently, there is no real way for artists to opt out of this data collection

Furthermore, the comparison to Clair Obscur is very flawed. At the end of the day, as your AI chatbot already said, Clair Obscur used only a few AI placeholder textures. At the end of the day, they were removed entirely. As for the remainder of the game? Made entirely by real human artists, from Music, to Models, to Textures, to Code, to Writing. Clair Obscur is a work of Art. Because at the end of the day the entirety of the game as was released was humanmade. AI only served as a TOOL not a replacement. 

You on the other hand, are not just using AI as a Tool, you are using it to replace the work of a real artist.  And again, we are back to my previous point. This site is full of real, talented artists. Do you really think that a demographic like that will find any interest or enthusiasm in what you're doing, when most of us won't even condone it?