Gives a very boardroom green capitalist vibe. The main mechanic is quite realist, albeit abstract, a bit idealist, but tempered by competing interests. The gameplay itself was quite satisfying! Would be cool to have project proposals that had impact on multiple meters (eg: health and environment) at once - or perhaps I just missed it, because given that it is real-time I couldn't follow the consequence of every choice in detail. 

Gives a very boardroom green capitalist vibe. The main mechanic is quite realist, albeit abstract, a bit idealist, but tempered by competing interests. The gameplay itself was quite satisfying! Would be cool to have project proposals that had impact on multiple meters (eg: health and environment) at once - or perhaps I just missed it, because given that it is real-time I couldn't follow the consequence of every choice in detail. 

Notes from gameplay:

• Main page music is nice - ambient and not too distracting
• Font is a little tricky to read
• The art style is smart - quick assets for a jam, but polished enough to feel like a proper style. The use of colors in the text and UI really enhance this to create overall visual cohesion
• Nice work including a tutorial!
• Main music is fun! 
• The hover effect and sound is a great detail (for play/menu buttons)
• Oh, it automatically starts! I lost the first round because I was making notes here, lol. Time for a restart!
• Oops used up all my energy too quickly! What tricky decisions these are. I wish I had a bit more time for decision making, heh
• The clicky typing sound the computer makes is a fun sound effect
• Good audio feedback with yes/no sounds
• The speed of decay feels quite punishing, especially if I want to check individual people's simulated results
• Hmm, I seem to have broken the game. Just kept clicking yes and now it no longer decays, nor does clicking yes/no change column values
• Replicated the lock. It seems like all values need to be fairly high (or maybe that's just a result of a good roll of policies giving me enough time/clicks for it to happen, locked at 82/88/99/90)
• Tested with all no and it didn't lock, so suspecting it has something to do with high values
• Oh nevermind, it means I won. For some reason I was thinking it had to be 100!

Fun concept. It definitely demonstrated the difficulty of balancing the needs of a group and how perfect agreement isn't possible.

Nice and thoughtful concept, and a great execution as well!