itch.io Community » Game Development » Get Feedback

Routeworks — try one or two pipe puzzles (free browser game)

A topic by blakkim created 11 days ago Views: 265 Replies: 14

Viewing posts 1 to 4

blakkim12 days ago (2 edits) (+1)

I'm working on Routeworks, a free browser puzzle where you rotate pipes to connect a start and a finish. It has 36 puzzles and a daily puzzle, with English and Korean. Development uses AI assistance, including code, text and visual assets.

Play: https://blakkim.itch.io/routeworks

Update, September 11: I'd like to hear from people trying it for the first time. You can choose any puzzle from the menu above the board; nothing needs to be unlocked.

Try puzzle 1 if you want to learn the controls, then choose one or two of puzzles 16, 24, 26 and 33. Any order is fine. There's no need to finish them all or aim for fewer turns.

What was finding the route like? A puzzle number and one thing you enjoyed or disliked would help. Was there a point when you wanted to keep going or stop? Please mention if this was your first time playing; your device/browser is useful if something goes wrong.

Please stop whenever you like. Playing needs no account or download, and there are no ads or purchases. You can leave feedback here or on the game page.

Earlier update, September 10: Puzzles 13–36 were added while keeping the original 12 unchanged. Today's puzzle keeps your progress when you leave and return. Earlier replies below refer to that version or the original 12 puzzles.

Pixelkiln11 days ago

Played it at a 375px viewport and solved puzzle 1 in 12 turns. The game itself is good on a phone: the board fills the width, cells come out 83x83 CSS px, and every tile is a real button whose aria-label says what it is and whether it is connected to start. That last part is rare and worth keeping.

Your problem is the itch embed, not the game. The page declares data-width 640 / data-height 360, and it has no fullscreen button - I checked your page source and another HTML5 game on this board for "fullscreen_btn"; theirs has one, yours does not. At exactly 640x360 only the top two rows of the 4x4 board are on screen: the board runs to 678px. Finish, the "tap the pipes to connect start to finish" line, Start over and How to play are all below the fold, and there is no way out of the frame. At 375px wide your page needs 830px of height.

So the "I did not know what the goal was" moment is probably just that. Tick the fullscreen option and raise the frame height.

Separately: you have one tag, Singleplayer. That is your whole browse surface.

blakkim11 days ago

Thanks for checking this so carefully, especially the accessibility. I added more relevant tags.

The current launch setting is “Click to launch in fullscreen,” with portrait orientation and scrollbars enabled. I checked the published page in Chrome at 375px wide: after Run game, I could reach the completion buttons and the end of How to play by scrolling. That was a viewport test, not a physical-phone check.

If it still cuts off after Run game on your setup, could you share your browser/device and whether scrolling inside the game works?

Pixelkiln10 days ago

Your question first: automated Chrome at an emulated 375x812 viewport with an Android user agent. A viewport test like yours, not a physical phone — worth weighing that against everything below.

I re-measured the game itself at that size just now, and the cut-off I reported is gone. With How to play collapsed your content ends at 713px, so it sits inside 812 with room to spare. Open How to play and the document grows to 953px, and it scrolls to the bottom correctly — max scroll is 141px and it reaches it. So yes, scrolling inside the game works.

I can also confirm both changes are live from outside: the game frame now carries start_maximized, and your tags went from 1 to 5.

One limit I should state rather than paper over: I could not test the fullscreen launch itself. requestFullscreen needs a real user gesture and my setup cannot produce one, so I verified the game, not the maximize path.

If you can borrow an iPhone, that is the case I would check — Safari there has historically not supported fullscreen on non-video elements, and that is the setting you just picked.

nknknk311 days ago

Hi, I completed puzzles 1, 2, 3, and 12 on PC. However, re-challenging them with fewer steps isn't really what I'm looking for in terms of gameplay.

blakkim11 days ago(+2)

Thanks for playing those puzzles and being honest about replaying for fewer moves. That helps me avoid assuming a better score is enough reason to return.

Was there a puzzle you particularly enjoyed, or a point where you felt like stopping? A short answer is plenty.

nknknk311 days ago (1 edit) (+1)

I tried all the levels. I personally like level 5 and maybe level 11.I feel that many of the earlier levels can be solved just by working backwards from the exit using straight pipes, which makes them feel a bit too straightforward. —but these later ones handle that aspect a bit better.

blakkim10 days ago(+1)

Thanks — the detail about tracing straight pipes backwards was especially useful. I’ve added puzzles 13–36 while keeping the original 12 unchanged. If you feel like trying one or two of the new puzzles, I’d be interested in whether finding the route feels satisfying, too obvious, or frustrating. No need to replay the earlier ones or chase fewer turns.

nknknk39 days ago

I tried them, and I like levels 16, 24, 26, and 33.

blakkim9 days ago(+1)

Thanks for coming back and naming those puzzles — that helps. Was there a particular moment or choice in 16, 24, 26 or 33 that you liked? No need to replay them; anything you remember, including a part you disliked, is useful.

nknknk38 days ago

I think the solutions to these levels are relatively unintuitive, and the directional cues feel a bit misleading.

blakkim8 days ago(+1)

Thanks — by directional cues, do you mean the starting pipe arrangement, or the markings for start, finish and connected pipes? Was the unexpected route what you enjoyed, or did it make the board confusing? One example from any of those puzzles is plenty; no need to replay them.

nknknk38 days ago

From what I remember, it's basically because some details change from straight pipes into right-angle bends, which makes the most obvious predicted route incorrect and forces you to take a detour—or else you just can't spot the so-called predicted route at first glance. Personally, I actually enjoy that sense of confusion more.

Lizzard Studio | Indie Games11 days ago

The response about fewer moves is a useful distinction between optimization and replay motivation. Have you considered showing an optional par only after the first completion, then measuring whether anyone chooses a second run?

Garmr Studio10 days ago

A bounded automated desktop UI check, not a human enjoyment or physical-phone test: puzzle 1 completed in 8 turns in the Korean UI at 1280×720. Arrow-key focus movement worked, and Enter and Space each rotated once. After completion, Next puzzle received focus and the completion controls were reachable in the fullscreen view.

One first-screen detail: at that height, the board and goal are visible, but the one-line instruction is below the initial fold. Putting a short ‘tap a pipe to rotate’ cue above the board could make the first action clearer. This only confirms the current desktop flow; please exclude it from human replay-interest counts.

Log in to reply Join the discussion. Log in or create a free itch.io account to continue.