Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

The Empty Frame — seeking feedback on clue fairness and difficulty (free browser beta)

A topic by HonzaVitha created 5 days ago Views: 57 Replies: 3
Viewing posts 1 to 2

Hi everyone! I’m developing The Empty Frame, a historical detective mystery, and I’m looking for honest feedback on the English beta.

A painting has vanished. Five witnesses give conflicting accounts. You examine visual evidence, question witnesses and connect clues across two acts.

Project page: https://honzavitha.itch.io/the-empty-frame

Use the “PLAY THE FREE ENGLISH BETA” link on the page. The game runs on an external website, with no payment, download or player account required.

I’m especially interested in: • Where did you get stuck or lose interest? • Were any clues or instructions too obvious? • Did the deductions feel fair, including the evidence the game accepted? • How readable and easy to use was it on your device? • If you tried the optional witness audio, did the voices suit the characters?

Even a partial playthrough would help. Please include your device/browser, approximate playing time and an overall rating out of 10. If you have a price in mind for a polished, complete case, please include the currency—zero is a valid answer too.

You can reply here or use the in-game Feedback form, which does not require enabling gameplay tracking. Please mark spoilers in public replies.

For transparency, AI tools assisted with the story, code, artwork, synthetic voices and English adaptation. The mystery has a fixed story and solution.

Thanks for helping me find what needs improving!

Tried the opening on desktop. The labelled evidence buttons were clear, and “a lie alone does not prove theft” is a useful reminder in the interviews. Stopped before a verdict, so I can’t judge the solution yet.

Thanks for trying the game and sharing your feedback! I’m glad the evidence labels were clear and the reminder about lying was useful.

Could I ask what made you stop before the verdict? Was it simply a matter of time, or did something feel confusing or lose your interest? Either way, it would really help me improve the game. Thanks again!

It was a short browser check of the opening, rather than a full playthrough. I don't have a recorded reason that would let me attribute the stop to confusion, time pressure or loss of interest. The evidence labels and interview reminder were clear in the part I tried, but I haven't reached the verdict and can't assess the final deduction yet.