Play game
OPR Mission Jam - GF LIFEBLOOD - JOB APPLICATION's itch.io pageResults
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Adherence to Theme | #18 | 3.552 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #35 | 3.252 | 3.319 |
| Rules Clarity | #37 | 2.980 | 3.042 |
| Concepts & Originality | #46 | 3.225 | 3.292 |
Ranked from 24 ratings. Score is adjusted from raw score by the median number of ratings per game in the jam.
Leave a comment
Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.





Comments
Hello, you have been selected as a possible candidate for the OPR mission designer position, congratulations! Please send an e-mail to jobs@onepagerules.com for us to follow up with you (make sure to include a link to your game submissions so we can easily identify you). Thanks
Nice and simple, sticks to the theme quite well.
As others have mentioned there is the issue with the growths' attack but that can easily be fixed.
Love the mood board. Nice and consistent colour theme and includes the OPR Logo for bonus points.
Sticks close to the theme, has a fun risk/reward with the spawning units, but needs some formating work. For instance, I think a full stat line for a "Spawned Defender" would be prefereable to leaving their rules crammed into a table cell. For instance, the immobile unit doesn't have a range for its attack, yet it has a proactive attack phase called out. How should it use this phase? It can't charge and has no ranged weaponry. It's also unclear where to place a spawned unit when one already exists. It is possible with a lucky set of roles that one objective could get 3 spawns in a single turn, and a 'line' of spawned forces could conceivably be placed end-to-end such that the last spawn might be entirely outside of the control zone for the spawning objective!
This is one of the better ones I've rated so far - good adherence to the theme, although I think the rules could do with a bit of clarification and simplification.
You mention that the organism will attack enemies... but how? It's Immobile and has no ranged attacks; it can't actually fight anything unless it gets charged.
Removing Immobile and instead requiring it to stay within 3" of its objective might be more elegant, yeah. Then you could also clearly specify that the attack is a Charge, which would also get rid of the ambiguity whether or not the target is allowed to strike back.
well Done. Keep it simple.