yeah no shit?? if you don't treat the message with sincerity though you're just stating the obvious while not making any worthwhile contribution to a topic, making covering the topic worthless.
if you think the game tackles it well, fair enough; but make that clear. responding with this dishonest shit makes it feel more like you dislike fascism for the moral aesthetics rather than the immediate danger such dangerous ideologies put on human society at large.
We live in a time where the message 'fascism and sexual assault are bad' is clearly not so obvious and widely accepted as it should be. See: the President of the United States. Is Horses subtle? No. But is this a time where we can really afford subtlety? If Horses makes one person question their complicity in what's happening in the world, then it's a good thing. If its message is way below your level of political discourse, good for you.
I know I'm like 250 days late to this but the kind of person who plays Horses and that's the first time they have ever questioned their complicity in fascism is such a frightening concept. You are describing a person who will never really be politically relevant in any way and lacks the capability to fend for themselves mentally. Needing video games to inform your worldview is already bad enough but needing Horses specifically to inform your worldview is like having a pacemaker for your brain.
