Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

To paraphrase. Use your best judgement.

You are a coder. You should be capable of recognising if you use ai code or not.

And if you are one of those "vibe coders", yeah, that's ai coding at the fullest.

Prompting search to give you the textbook example of a function you want to use and adapting that result in your code, is not, imho, even if the result was generated by an ai. But if you ask the ai to write the functions with your parameters and copy the result, it is.

AI does not make a game slop. It's the human that releases a slop game. And there are plenty of human made slop games too. It's just that the slop game creators can make a lot of these with ai in a short time. Itch is self publishing which means that there is no publisher that would block low effort slop. In theory the quality guidelines would deny indexing for slop. But distinguishing an amateur game from professional slop ain't easy.

AI does not make a game slop. It’s the human that releases a slop game. And there are plenty of human made slop games too. It’s just that the slop game creators can make a lot of these with ai in a short time. Itch is self publishing which means that there is no publisher that would block low effort slop. In theory the quality guidelines would deny indexing for slop. But distinguishing an amateur game from professional slop ain’t easy.

You are going to to lose that culture war. In ten years, using “slop” as anything other than a derogatory term for AI output is going to be like using “gay” in its previous sense of “happy” instead of “homosexual”. Oh, the word will still be applied to human works, but the subtext is going to be “you are less than human for creating something this bad”.

(+1)

I have doubts. Slop just means low quality or effort, or even waste. And it has a lot of meanings outside of software reinforcing that meaning. Not the least sloppy. Slop even is a dish. It was always a derogatory term for all sorts of things.

In some languages they seem to have used slop as a term for ai slop as a loan word. Who knows how that term will evolve in those languages.

Speaking of words, it's been a while since I heard the term shovelware. Something I would currently call slop.

Thanks for the reply.

After considering the problem further, the problem I would be trying to solve with such a rule is disclosing human creativity.

Reviewing the linked quality guidelines, it appears they're worried about legal implications -- presumably around abuse of fair use, which would imply that an "ethically trained" model MIGHT squeak by moderation's concerns, but wouldn't do anything to assure users worried about shortcuts.

My guess it's mostly about the transitive propagation of the "has gen ai content" attribute.

If you make an asset with gen ai, you know what you did.

If you obtain a premade asset and include it in your game, you do not - unless it was properly advertised as such.

And since a lot of people are concerned about gen ai usage for a lot of reasons, they want clear labeling. And there are even some laws that try regulating that ai content and ai bots need to be labeled as such. What's happening in games is tame compared to all the crap that is happening with ai at other places.