Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

The ants are listening - help us get Bugtopia sharper

A topic by Sam Palumbo created 2 days ago Views: 73 Replies: 7
Viewing posts 1 to 2

We've spent a while taming, riding, and charting the flowerbed. Now we want to hear how it actually plays — not from the code.

We're not fishing for "good job". We're after the moments it broke, bored, confused, or delighted you. To make that useful, here's exactly what we're reading carefully:

1. The opening hour: Did you know what to do next, or did you wander? Which first tasks clicked, and which felt like chores?

2. Taming & riding: How long before you trusted, tamed, and climbed your first ant? Is the beetle a worthwhile upgrade? Did the wolf spider feel earned?

3. Day / night pressure: Is the night scary but fair? Did the wolf spider read as a threat you respected, or an interruption?

4. The fungus loop: Gather, brew, keep the ants working: a satisfying little economy, or busywork? Is a walking pack-as-brewery clever or fiddly?

5. Art & sound: Chunky pixels and a living score: does the world hold together? Do the bugs read as animals at a glance, or did anything look wrong?

6. Controls: Desktop and touch. Does riding feel good? Was there a moment you fought the controls instead of the backyard?

Give us detail: one specific moment ("I died on the first night because…") is worth ten generalities. Best places to drop it: the comments here, or the in-game journal.

Bugtopia → https://sam-palumbo.itch.io/bugtopia — and tell us what to fix, cut, or add. 🐜🪲🕷️

(+1)

Not played — this is your three store screenshots only, so I can take the art question (5) and the wolf-spider half of (3).

Contrast of each creature against the ground it stands on, measured on a local ring around the sprite: ridden ant 2.3:1, bug on the dirt 2.1:1, ridden beetle 1.5:1, wolf spider 1.4:1. None reaches 3:1, the usual floor for a graphic that has to be discernible.

The sharper number is internal. The wolf spider's body is 1.03:1 lightest pixel to darkest. It is not a dark animal, it is a flat hole in the floor — silhouette is the only channel left, which is why they read as shapes rather than animals at a glance.

The gold selection ellipse under it measures 2.12:1 against that same ground: more contrast than the spider. At night you find the wolf spider by the UI ring, not by the creature.

Cheapest fix is a 1px rim light, not more internal shading — at 1.03:1 detail is spent where nothing survives. We learned that on a tileset where wooden stairs vanished into a plank floor.

I sell pixel-art asset packs on itch, so weigh that.

(1 edit)

Thank you for the incredibly detailed feedback! I ended up spending a long time remaking all the sprites based on your comment, and the final result was absolutely worth the effort. I really appreciate you taking the time to share your expertise and help me improve the game.

(+1)

Glad it was worth the time, and thank you for saying what you actually changed.

Two things, both about the page rather than the build.

Your screenshots look like the pre-rework ones, unless I am misreading them. The page's Updated stamp is 07 Sep 14:00 UTC, but the three gallery images still carry ids 29762760 / 67 / 68, which sit below images I uploaded to my own pages on 6 Sep. If that is right, the sprites you remade are invisible to anyone who does not press play — and for a browse visitor the screenshots are the game. Re-shooting the night scene is probably the highest-value ten minutes available to you right now.

You have two tags: Survival and Isometric. I looked at the shelves: survival is 81,073 games and isometric 5,497. Meanwhile ants is 157 and colony-sim 63. You have a game about riding ants and being hunted by a wolf spider, filed on two shelves nobody reaches the bottom of. Those tags are your entire browse surface.

I've just updated the screenshots with the new sprites—thanks for catching that! The tip about the tags was also fantastic; I went ahead and added them to the page. I really appreciate you taking the time to help me out again!

(+1)

Both landed - the gallery ids are new (29853980/81/82, up from 297627xx) and the six tags are live on the page.

One bigger thing I ran into while checking: your page does not appear in itch's search index. Searching "Bugtopia" returns two other games with that name (brandtware's and s-o-n-d-e-r-l-a-n-d's) and not yours. That is itch's own test for it - the Getting Indexed doc says a quick way to check is to enter your project's full title in the search box. As a control in the same pass I searched four games published today off /games/newest and all four came back, so it is not lag, and you are six days published.

If I have that right, the tags cannot do anything yet: an unindexed page is on no browse page at all. Worth checking Public access settings for "Unlisted in search & browse" first, then support if it is not that.

Also, I did not mean delete Survival. Tags are not a budget - you are at six, and isometric+survival is its own 378-game shelf.

(+1)

For the opening hour, I’d track the exact first stall: can a new player identify the first tame target and the next fungus task without a prompt? That makes “wandered” actionable. For touch, test riding with one thumb while the camera is moving—if both compete, a short remappable swipe/hold tutorial could prevent the first ride from feeling slippery.

Thank you for the suggestions! I’ve added a journal system with missions, item tracking, and waypoints to guide players through those early tasks. For the controls, I built something similar to PUBG; it's functional right now, though it will take a bit more time to fully tune up.