This is mostly in reply to Asloyke, before anybody goes into 'View more in thread' to see my full reply;
The reason is that I am not going to edit my response, since the wording here is very important (Asloyke missed it completely).
But what I'll say to anyone in this thread is: learn how to read the next time you defend a developer and his 'free' 'worldbuilding' game.
The only one that needs to learn to read is you. It's still completely unnecessary and stupid to add needless information like what kinks the developer likes in the page. They've already clearly informed what kinds of vore and other kinks will be in the game on their page, and if you don't like the kinds of vore that are shown or given more attention then that's a you problem not theirs.
...You do know that, respectfully speaking, you are simply admitting that you are into cocks as well, right? And, judging by how insecure your wording is, you don't like to see it yourself? At least, that's what everybody is after here so far, and based on my observation (Looking through the provided Walkthrough Google Docs, there are 13 counts of the word 'cock', 11 counts of the word 'anal', 7 counts of the word 'oral', and the rest is under). So yeah, you are correct. Some of it is clearly given more attention: the developer is into cocks; their kink is around cocks. If YOU don't like to hear that, then, with all due respect, continue sucking it, I guess?
This is in response to Atxin1. Before anybody goes into 'view more in thread' over there as well to see my reply, I am just going to straight up tell you what the game provides and let you figure out the rest (in the provided Walkthrough Google Docs, there are 13 counts of the word 'cock', 11 counts of the word 'anal', 7 counts of the word 'oral', and the rest is under). What that means is that Atxin1 is correct. The developer is into cocks, as he has given more attention to it. Not sure how that's my problem, but there you go.
