Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Played one route through to Open Doors: receipt, survey with Mara, staff proposal, straight to the sound booth, clause comparison, and keeping the personal letter private. I'm building short personal story games under P.S.Me, so this is fellow-maker feedback, not an independent recommendation.


The clearest practical consequence was Sana becoming the handover contact. The ending says that adds a job to her week and lets Celia keep her personal account private. That is more convincing than a changed adjective or a generic "they trusted you" line. I haven't compared another route, so I can't say how much the alternatives differ.


My first story stumble was Celia admitting there was no theft in "Under the work lights." I had only just started investigating the missing agreement, so the mystery felt resolved before I had much chance to form a theory. One extra clue or contradiction before that admission could make it feel earned.


The operation/access comparison was easy to follow. I'd replay to see what changes if Celia reads the letter herself, rather than just collect the other ending labels.

Thanks for naming the exact route and the point where the mystery lost its force. The early 'no theft' admission cuts off investigation before the player can form a theory; that is useful criticism.

I have now replaced the opening with a different case: a forged recording, a locked exit, and playable recording/circuit checks. Your note about Sana's added work is useful guidance for keeping consequences concrete. The original edition is retained under Controls, so that route remains available.

I appreciate the distinction between fellow-maker feedback and an independent recommendation. I will keep that distinction in how I assess the game.