Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit) (+6)(-1)

Last I checked that was 1. patron only so lots of people will have to go into a high entry bar to even try it and 2. Chad is a guy in your version which is repellent to me. 

Having played Ascension , I understand the lifting of the DNA, but I don't know they are apple for apple at this point. 

(1 edit) (+1)(-7)

1: Yeah, I do that on purpose out of principle toward my labor and how I value it, even if it means fewer people get to experience it.

You could consider OutGrow a half-endorsed demo, if you wish, since it was built off my game and permitted by me, even if it initially didn't have my explicit permission and feigned originality.

2: Sure, but the initial concept was meant to favor giant couples, not just giantesses. My earliest concept, after all, only focused on the player character (male) and partner character (female) having a dynamic cooperative-competitive growing relationship, before it evolved to include external meddling like in the form of Chad and Stacy, and such.

(1 edit) (+7)(-1)

1. That's fine, but don't be upset I don't really seem too interested.  You're pushing me to try something I looked at and found unappealing. Way too much investment for something that even crosses into areas that disgust me.

As to your sub part, You should just fully endorse it then? Mostly seems counter productive to waffle. That's just me though, really just left my impressions since I had fun.

2. Okay, that sounds different than this. Female/male etc.  I understand, I've played Ascension way back and had thoroughly forgotten about it when I came across this. I understand your concept and the evolutionary connection, but this is a mod. 


(-6)

I understand you're doing this contrarian thing partly given you misunderstood the situation at hand.

There aren’t many situations where someone takes another developer's code and concepts, modifies it, and monetizes it and expects everything to be hunkydory.

But I am merciful in that regard, and I am just wanting to put it on the record that your concerns are derived from my original work being modified to make OutGrow.

(+4)

Okay, I'm not 'contrarian', I'm pointing out it's exhausting to have you not just pick a lane or pour contempt on people enjoying something.  

You still haven't explained what, if any, answer to how Chad, the female character here and male in your game used for what I think was an exploration of maledom/masculinity, defined in your version and explained to be one for one. Unless your Chad's secretly Yaoi for your male MC in lab of gods?  

(-2)

You like OutGrow. I made OutGrow as a co-developer. I appreciate that you like my work.

So let's just stop this whole "assumption" shtick between the two of us, because without the context of playing Goddess Maker, in its original form unmodded, explaining is futile for me to do.

I have played goddess maker though. I didn't like it when I played it.

You didn't answer my question either.

I don't think you did though, especially not up to A.3. As Chad's whole purpose is to provide the excuse to go from Serums → Super Serums → Permanent Growth Machines → Hyper Growth Machines → etc., given he serves as a rival to the lab's scientific growth. With everything else being comedy with him.

Also, what's with the whole using your alt accounts to downvote– upvote? Don't you think that's kinda childish?

(1 edit)

I did play a version of it. If A3 is the current one then no, not that. I played it a ways back and didn't keep up with it. 

I don't have alt accounts. Truthfully I've downvoted you two times total, both when I felt you were being mean spirited.  

Yeah, I was being mean-spirited, but I take the position that I don't like AI being used in art, games, and the like.

So it's ideological rather than a personal attack, if you would accept the difference of my offense.