Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+2)

no, lolicon literally means "an affinity, attraction, or obsession with loli characters".  it has nothing to do with kids, let alone wanting to fuck them, and is a completely separate thing from pedophilia. it actually is considered schediaphilia otherwise known as toonophilia, which is the attraction to cartoon characters.


you literally have no evidence of me saying sleeping with real kids is ok in any capacity. you also have no evidence of any of your other claims against any of these fine people, outside of your own unreliable schizo ramblings.


we have literally proven mare is a shota multiple times. you are just denying it BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU A PEDO BY YOUR OWN LOGIC. your denial however changes absolutely nothing, he is still a shot and you are still using AI talking points while projecting onto others

(-4)

aww lying again and contradicting yourself plus being attracted to kids is pedophila literally that's what a loli is a kid, and if your attracted to a kid your a pedo, so yes you and any scum like you are pedophiles even if the kid is fictional it's still co by LAW

(1 edit) (+2)

wow, you once again managed to get everything you said fucking wrong.


pedophile is specifially the attraction to REAL KIDS, with psychologists even going out of their way to say fictional content cannot be used when diagnosing the disorder. loli means "cute, petite, and/or doll-like female character", traits that makes them look young, not kid or any other version of children. so no, lolicon and pedophile are 2 completely seperate and distinct terms with people going out of their way to keep them seperate.



lolicon also isn't considered csam under US law, or in over 70% of the world. most nations that ban it actually ban all adult content, and the few with laws specifically against loli actually give it a seperate classification from csam. Hell, I even showed evidence that what you are trying to claim is csam WAS SOMETHING YOU CAN BUY AT WALMART.


fianlly, and answer this one honestly, IF YOU CONSIDER IT CSAM THEN WHY DID YOU ASK TO HAVE A SCENE OF FUCKING A SHOTA ELF UP THE ASS? DOESN'T THAT MAKE YOU A PEDO BY YOUR OWN LOGIC? SO ARE YOU A HYPOCRITE OR A PEDOPHILE JOSH

(-2)

aww lying again pedo plus you have shown no proof or evidence of literally anything you literally think every state in the US has the same exact law and don't know anything about any law outside your country , and it's funny that you say most countries that ban cp ban most porn when you have no proof of that.

(+1)

wow, you just can’t help but get everything wrong


lolicon was literally ruled federally protected in 2002 during Ashcroft vs free speech coalition. This same precedent was reiterated in 2004 when people tried to use the 2003 protect act for depictions involving cherubs, with it setting it as part of the first amendment protections.  That is federal law, WHICH APPLIES TO EVERY SINGLE STATE IN THE US.



Again, why are you lying? I never said anything about the countries that ban csam, I said most countries that ban LOLICON ban all adult content. Csam, which is made by involving a real kid in any way, is universally condemned and illegal in 90% of countries(barring like 2 from Africa and a handful in South America). Lolicon and csam are 2 separate and legally distinct things, it’s really not that hard a concept to grasp.



What you are doing is a blatant false equivalence. Much like if I said all horror movies are illegal and pointed out the laws against snuff films(where real people get horrifically tortured and killed for entertainment) as justification. They are completely separate things you absolute 0 IQ troglodyte.



Now answer the previous question, WHAT DOES THAT MAKE YOU FOR WANTING TO FUCK A SHOTA ELF UP THE ASS JOSH? ARE YOU A HYPOCRITE OR A PEDOPHILE?