Thanks for explaining that! Knowing that some clues can be true and relevant without being enough to prove the case helps me understand the result I got.
The separate feedback for the suspect, motive, and each evidence card sounds like exactly what I was looking for. I wanted to understand where my reasoning fell short so I could go back through the clues and reconsider my choices. Seeing why a particular card didn’t hold up would make another attempt feel much more purposeful.
I really enjoyed how the café and investigation fed into each other, so it’s good to hear you’re continuing to develop it. Thanks for taking the time to explain!