Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

BitDot428

4
Posts
A member registered Oct 23, 2025 · View creator page →

Creator of

Recent community posts

Hey bearrittas — really appreciate the deep dive, both comments. This update is a direct response to it.


1) Debt: You were right that it was basically free money — the credit limit was pegged to income, and buying assets with borrowed cash raised income, which raised the limit, so it could spiral (that's exactly what your second comment demonstrated at $23M). Fixed the root cause: the limit is now tied to net worth instead, which doesn't get inflated by the borrow-and-buy loop, and the rate now scales up with leverage instead of sitting near-flat. Re-ran your exact sequence (borrow max -> buy everything -> upgrade -> repeat) and it caps out at $1,600 in debt now instead of tens of millions.


2) Stocks: bumped volatility and tuned drift on 3 of the 4 tickers so there's more real swing. Didn't do a full risk-systems rebuild this pass (turnover, competitor risk, etc.) — that's a bigger project I'm tracking for later.


3) Borrowing against stock holdings: didn't add this yet — good idea, on the list.


4) Real estate: added a maintenance cost that eats into rent, a monthly vacancy chance per district (rent drops while vacant), and put the actual numbers on screen — gross yield, upkeep, and net monthly income per holding, plus a vacancy flag. Still just the three original districts, no verticals/redevelopment/cyclicality yet.


The bones-are-there stuff (P/L, balance sheets, cyclicality, redevelopment) is real and I want to get to it — this pass was scoped to close the actual exploit and add the missing cost/risk layer you called out. Thanks for playing it this hard, it's genuinely useful.

Thanks for the callout! I dug into this and you're right — there was actually a structural gap: food and gold both had a tech that boosted their production (Irrigation, Currency), but wood and stone had none, despite being the two resources almost every building and tech costs. I just added two new techs, Forestry (+20% wood) and Stonecutting (+20% stone), available from the start of the game. Should help them keep pace much better now — let me know if it still feels tight after picking those up!

Thank you for the detailed feedback — this is exactly the kind of thing that's hard to catch as the solo dev!


On the button issue: you found a real bug. Hovering triggered a 1px "lift" animation that could physically move the button out from under your cursor, causing it to rapidly flicker between hover/not-hover (and only register clicks during the "hover" frames) — especially if your cursor rested near the bottom edge of a button. Fixed in the build I just uploaded by removing that lift effect entirely.


On difficulty: also a fair catch, and it's related to something another player flagged too. Raid strength used to scale only with wave number, so early raids could feel arbitrary (and low-stakes either way), while a player who invested heavily in walls would rapidly outscale the raids and stop feeling any tension. I've adjusted it so raid strength also scales with your current defense investment — the early game is untouched, but the more you stack defense, the more the raids scale to match, so it should stay a meaningful threat instead of becoming a non-issue a few minutes in.


Invasion depth and UI information density are both fair calls for this early a build — noted for the roadmap as the game gets more fleshed out. Really appreciate you taking the time, and glad you got some enjoyment out of it already!

Thanks so much for this — genuinely one of the most useful pieces of feedback I've gotten on this prototype. You called it exactly: the economy and raids were tuned to be forgiving early on and never really tightened up, so once you had a small stack of buildings there was nothing left pushing back.

I just pushed an update that:

- Raises the cost curve on buildings, tech, and era advancement so scaling up gets meaningfully more expensive

- Ramps raid strength much more aggressively from wave 2 onward (wave 1 is untouched, so the early game still feels fair)

- Makes losing a raid hurt more (higher resource loss, especially later on)

The goal is for the food/wood/stone/gold vs. defense vs. expansion decision to actually feel like a real decision a few waves in, instead of something you can steamroll. Would love to hear whether it lands better for you — thanks again, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping for!

返信編集