Yeah, of course that happens sometimes. Anyone who doesn't follow puritanical principles eventually gets accused of being a pedophile, or at least sees it happen a lot. Anyway, I was certainly not arguing against anything you said, and like I said, I respect you finding the sources. I just personally wouldn't have even included the AI bits, even as supplementary evidence (and despite this being illogical) it will make people take your position less seriously due to public opinion on generative models like that. It's just a tip for getting your point across more reliably, take it or leave it - your argument here was solid.
and no their argument wasn't solid plus AI slop gets shit wrong all the time and the only "source" they had was AI slop and a site that couldn't be reached and one that contradicts what he was saying and it's funny you say someone has to follow a strict, austere approach to morality, religion, and daily life that emphasizes self-control, hard work, and the rejection of worldly pleasures when they don't have to do that not to be called pedophiles they just have to not want to fuck kids that's it and not defend pedophiles like you do, heck it's funny only the scum who try and defend pedophiles are the ones arguing against me and only scum who have called kids hot or said pedo shit in the past are the ones arguing with me.
HAHAHAH AND YOU ARE A FRIEND OF STRONGEST BEGGAR WHO LIKES AI HAHAHAHAH of course you defend the pedophiles and ai slop you probably try to say it's a bad thing to use but then use it in private and virtue signal online while watching cp and jerking off to cp then cry whenever anyone calls you out for defending pedophiles and liking ai slop
yup. dude even started coming after me when i defended him from the claim he was a pedophile.
heres the context, he likes a shota elf called mare from overlord(evidence in comments by padyshar) and i said that him liking such a cahracter or something like marin kitagawa aren't enough to call him a pdf on its own. he immediately responds by claiming liking no game no life or similar anime makes you a pedo(not true) and the claiming there are laws against loli/shota WHEN HE WAS THE ONE WANTING TO SCREW THE SHOTA ELF.
literally tries to claim im a tate fan when i have hated them for years, nothing but scammers
aww lying again pedophile? and no there's no evidence pedophile or that i wanna fuck a shota elf, and its funny you say your not a tate fan yet use words like soy boy and have the same bullshit logic as them, and there are laws against shota and lolis, look up the PROTECT Act of 2003, you dumb pedophile.
dude, there are literally screenshots of you wanting to screw the elf from overlord. Why are you lying, heck the thing you are calling me a PDF for is me DEFENDING YOU.
Also, you just hilariously wrong. Loli and shota are both legally protected in the US. The 2003 protect act was ruled unconstitutionally vague due to criminalizing various historical art pieces involving cherubs and being used against an adult porn star under the clause that “she appeared to be a child” due to her height and appearance. The only law that applies is obscenity law, and as ruled in 2008, 2012, 2016, and as recently as a couple months ago loli and shota do not meet the threshold to be considered obscene in a court of law on their own.
Again, if we went by your own logic, you are a pedophile for wanting some overlord elf “bussy”. The fact you are trying to call me a pedo for DEFENDING YOU shows how far gone you are.