This was the exact source they used for their claims, which they took out of context, which is why I included the Discord in the first place. I used the AI because it is the first source you see when you search for this incident in any browser, and these were the simple follow-up questions. I also clarified that I used the AI as extra evidence, which wasn’t relevant to my main sources, listed below. Also, I never said Weird World will pursue legal action, but that they can because of the amount this user posted in other games and the fact they have been doing this for 3 years. I am not making a defense for Weird World, but for the players who decide to play this game and their protection if this person ever takes people’s comments, clips them out of context, and then sends them to a multitude of people out of spite, which he has already done through Discord.
Yeah, of course that happens sometimes. Anyone who doesn't follow puritanical principles eventually gets accused of being a pedophile, or at least sees it happen a lot. Anyway, I was certainly not arguing against anything you said, and like I said, I respect you finding the sources. I just personally wouldn't have even included the AI bits, even as supplementary evidence (and despite this being illogical) it will make people take your position less seriously due to public opinion on generative models like that. It's just a tip for getting your point across more reliably, take it or leave it - your argument here was solid.
and no their argument wasn't solid plus AI slop gets shit wrong all the time and the only "source" they had was AI slop and a site that couldn't be reached and one that contradicts what he was saying and it's funny you say someone has to follow a strict, austere approach to morality, religion, and daily life that emphasizes self-control, hard work, and the rejection of worldly pleasures when they don't have to do that not to be called pedophiles they just have to not want to fuck kids that's it and not defend pedophiles like you do, heck it's funny only the scum who try and defend pedophiles are the ones arguing against me and only scum who have called kids hot or said pedo shit in the past are the ones arguing with me.
HAHAHAH AND YOU ARE A FRIEND OF STRONGEST BEGGAR WHO LIKES AI HAHAHAHAH of course you defend the pedophiles and ai slop you probably try to say it's a bad thing to use but then use it in private and virtue signal online while watching cp and jerking off to cp then cry whenever anyone calls you out for defending pedophiles and liking ai slop
yup. dude even started coming after me when i defended him from the claim he was a pedophile.
heres the context, he likes a shota elf called mare from overlord(evidence in comments by padyshar) and i said that him liking such a cahracter or something like marin kitagawa aren't enough to call him a pdf on its own. he immediately responds by claiming liking no game no life or similar anime makes you a pedo(not true) and the claiming there are laws against loli/shota WHEN HE WAS THE ONE WANTING TO SCREW THE SHOTA ELF.
literally tries to claim im a tate fan when i have hated them for years, nothing but scammers
aww lying again pedophile? and no there's no evidence pedophile or that i wanna fuck a shota elf, and its funny you say your not a tate fan yet use words like soy boy and have the same bullshit logic as them, and there are laws against shota and lolis, look up the PROTECT Act of 2003, you dumb pedophile.
dude, there are literally screenshots of you wanting to screw the elf from overlord. Why are you lying, heck the thing you are calling me a PDF for is me DEFENDING YOU.
Also, you just hilariously wrong. Loli and shota are both legally protected in the US. The 2003 protect act was ruled unconstitutionally vague due to criminalizing various historical art pieces involving cherubs and being used against an adult porn star under the clause that “she appeared to be a child” due to her height and appearance. The only law that applies is obscenity law, and as ruled in 2008, 2012, 2016, and as recently as a couple months ago loli and shota do not meet the threshold to be considered obscene in a court of law on their own.
Again, if we went by your own logic, you are a pedophile for wanting some overlord elf “bussy”. The fact you are trying to call me a pedo for DEFENDING YOU shows how far gone you are.
ok show one proof of that law being vague and not covering it pedo oh wait you can't cause you know your wrong and the only "evidence" you have is AI slop, and yes wanting to screw a elf that is a grown ass man who is over 70 years old you dumbass that's not a kid, and no you weren't defending me, and it's funny you dumb pedophiles can't provide a single actual screenshot proving it's legal in the entire US, please provide a picture where it says child porn is legal everywhere in the us you pedo, and yes shota and loli is cp, and again pedophile you never defended me and if we went by my logic I'm not a pedophile since guess what my character has a defined age and it's above 70 heck way above 70, wanting to fuck an adult elf doesn't make someone a pedophile, it's when you like cp like no game no life and all those manga and manwha and anime I showed is when your a pedophile plus your liking co and paying for sexual images of a CHILD WHICH THAT ELF ISNT.
dude, I literally gave you examples. In 2004, people used the protect act against multiple forms of art including things like depictions of cherubs. This was what got it ruled “unconstitutionally vague”. This was upheld when people tried to use the same law against an adult porn star in her 20s, using the harkness scale to claim she “looked like a child”, and the court dismissed it outright. So no, loli/shota aren’t considered cp by any metric, with the US having a very clear standard that for something to be csam it must reference, depict, or be indistinguishable from a real child.
THE AUTHOR OUTRIGHT GIVES AN OFFICIAL HEIGHT OF 104 CENTIMETERS. That’s shorter than Frieren AND megumin(someone who is canonically only 13). He is also stated to be very childlike in his actions, and ainz views him as his child. Your only defense is the same as the “900 year old loli” defense, which is the same logic as people who want to bang kanna kamui you absolute hypocrite.
So yes, YOU WANT TO FUCK A SHOTA ELF. By your own logic, if you consider loli and shota csam, YOU DIRECTLY ASKED FOR CSAM. You want to claim everyone else is a pedo for anime, games, adult women, you are literally calling me a pedo for defending your ass, MEANWHILE YOU WANT TO FUCK AN ELF THE SAME HEIGHT AS AN 8 YEAR OLD.
this is the last time i will ever treat you with any form of respect. Have fun whacking off to a character who breaks the protect act you seem to care about, all while asking people to make what you consider csam for you. Have fun you projecting pedophile mother fucker, because I will guarantee you it won’t last before EVERYONE is sick of your shit
aww and just lying about what a source is pedo? plus I've only gone after pedophiles like you who defend soldier09 and padyshar who both are defending pedophiles and guess what dumbass AI isn't a source or evidence and trying to use it in court can make you go to jail for falsifying evidence and tampering with it and no we can't go after me plus he is defending pedophiles by banning anyone who calls out the pedophiles, and please provide one fucking screenshot of me calling anyone who just plays the game a pedophile ccompared to the amount of pedophiles like you I call out who think AI is a god and who would defend Epstein if the AI slop told them to.