Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+4)

I think everyone who finds H-games on itch is familiar with this type of behavior and doesn't need it to be spelled out, but I respect you doing the research. (Maybe don't cite AI responses though, those are unreliable AT BEST.) Also, there's not a chance Weird pursues legal action lmao, the person making the accusation literally got banned in the Discord and thus would not be considered a reliable source by anyone with a functioning brain.

(+4)

This was the exact source they used for their claims, which they took out of context, which is why I included the Discord in the first place. I used the AI because it is the first source you see when you search for this incident in any browser, and these were the simple follow-up questions. I also clarified that I used the AI as extra evidence, which wasn’t relevant to my main sources, listed below. Also, I never said Weird World will pursue legal action, but that they can because of the amount this user posted in other games and the fact they have been doing this for 3 years. I am not making a defense for Weird World, but for the players who decide to play this game and their protection if this person ever takes people’s comments, clips them out of context, and then sends them to a multitude of people out of spite, which he has already done through Discord.

(+1)

Yeah, of course that happens sometimes. Anyone who doesn't follow puritanical principles eventually gets accused of being a pedophile, or at least sees it happen a lot. Anyway, I was certainly not arguing against anything you said, and like I said, I respect you finding the sources. I just personally wouldn't have even included the AI bits, even as supplementary evidence (and despite this being illogical) it will make people take your position less seriously due to public opinion on generative models like that. It's just a tip for getting your point across more reliably, take it or leave it - your argument here was solid.

(-4)

and no their argument wasn't solid plus AI slop gets shit wrong all the time and the only "source" they had was AI slop and a site that couldn't be reached and one that contradicts what he was saying and it's funny you say someone has to follow a strict, austere approach to morality, religion, and daily life that emphasizes self-control, hard work, and the rejection of worldly pleasures when they don't have to do that not to be called pedophiles they just have to not want to fuck kids that's it and not defend pedophiles like you do, heck it's funny only the scum who try and defend pedophiles are the ones arguing against me and only scum who have called kids hot or said pedo shit in the past are the ones arguing with me.

(-5)

HAHAHAH AND YOU ARE A FRIEND OF STRONGEST BEGGAR WHO LIKES AI HAHAHAHAH of course you defend the pedophiles and ai slop you probably try to say it's a bad thing to use but then use it in private and virtue signal online while watching cp and jerking off to cp then cry whenever anyone calls you out for defending pedophiles and liking ai slop

yup. dude even started coming after me when i defended him from the claim he was a pedophile.


heres the context, he likes a shota elf called mare from overlord(evidence in comments by padyshar) and i said that him liking such a cahracter or something like marin kitagawa aren't enough to call him a pdf on its own. he immediately responds by claiming liking no game no life or similar anime makes you a pedo(not true) and the claiming there are laws against loli/shota WHEN HE WAS THE ONE WANTING TO SCREW THE SHOTA ELF.


literally tries to claim im a tate fan when i have hated them for years, nothing but scammers

aww lying again pedophile? and no there's no evidence pedophile or that i wanna fuck a shota elf, and its funny you say your not a tate fan yet use words like soy boy and have the same bullshit logic as them, and there are laws against shota and lolis, look up the PROTECT Act of 2003, you dumb pedophile.

(-5)

aww and just lying about what a source is pedo? plus I've only gone after pedophiles like you who defend soldier09 and padyshar who both are defending pedophiles and guess what dumbass AI isn't a source or evidence and trying to use it in court can make you go to jail for falsifying evidence and tampering with it and no we can't go after me plus he is defending pedophiles by banning anyone who calls out the pedophiles, and please provide one fucking screenshot of me calling anyone who just plays the game a pedophile ccompared to the amount of pedophiles like you I call out who think AI is a god and who would defend Epstein if the AI slop told them to.

(-5)

aww another dumbass who thinks proof isn't rproof when there's fucking images but I'm sure you pedophiles think just because someone is banned from a pedophile server that whoever got banned is in the wrong not the pedo server, he k i bet you think everyone who got banned from an edp supporting server is a bad person because they were trolling the server?