Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Thanks for sharing! I want to be honest about my feelings—after all, that’s more valuable than just polite praise: this piece didn't really resonate with me.

Right up to the end, I wasn't quite sure what I was supposed to be doing. The text was very abstract to me, so I spent most of the time guessing at the intent. It wasn't until the very end that I realized the "Name" input field was asking for a real person's name—I had entered "123" because I thought it was just a placeholder. By the time I understood the point, the experience was already over; for me, it felt more like a brief guided reflection than a game. Maybe I’m just too focused on whether a game is "fun," haha.

If you plan to keep developing this, I think using more straightforward wording at the beginning would help (e.g., "Who in your life would you give this to? Why?"). Also, adding some interactive elements before the ending might help players feel more immersed and emotionally invested when the final message is delivered.

Good luck with your development!

azx7809, this is the note I wanted and least expected, so thank you for being plain instead of polite. Two things I'm taking from it.


The name field. You typed 123 because it looked like a placeholder, so the one act the whole piece hangs on got skipped. That is not you missing the point. That is the piece failing to signal it. A field that wants a real person's name should read as a person, not a form. I'm fixing the wording.


The abstraction. The vague middle is on purpose, the sentence at the door is the only thing that loads, but on purpose is not a defence if it costs you the point. If you spent the whole run guessing at intent, the style became a tax. That's on the piece too.


So: tough read, exact read, more useful than a vote. I know what to change because you said it plainly.

azx7809, your read got built. The name field was the tell: you typed 123 because it looked like a placeholder, so the one act the piece hangs on never fired. v0.8 removes the box completely. The door is now one sentence you finish, with the name as a blank inside it and the rest of the line already written. The opening says from screen one that it is for one real person. Pushing to itch now, so if you reload and still see the old box, give it a minute. If the blank still reads like a form to you, say so and I will change the object again.