It’s a strange concept. I think there’s an interesting idea there, but it’s hard for me to get into it. The conversations feel too short to get much useful information out of, and are a bit hard to follow. I don’t really feel like I am “dating” the suspects, just questioning them, but with one line of dating up front. Maybe this would benefit from stretching out to multiple “dates” to slowly uncover facts of the case.

Law game is an interesting concept. I dig it. Crossover with a love match game...neat twist.

Ooh, I like text adventures! The concept is pretty interesting, and the character concept art you showed in the game's description looks great.

The premise of trying to solve a case through dating rather than investigation and interrogation is fun. But to me, the dates didn't quite feel like actual dates, and I felt that the characters' personalities didn't come through as well in writing as they did in the illustrations.

I ended up guessing the Grandma as the culprit, which turned out to be wrong. The game mentioned that the public was dissatisfied with the show, but never explained why. I think that could be a good way to give the player hints about what they missed and encourage them to try again.

I like that you decided to revive an old idea you never had the opportunity to make, and I think the core concept is very interesting. I'd love to see the writing developed further to make the most of it. 

Thank you for sharing your game!

This isn't really my type of game, but I find the idea interesting. The game worked right away, and there are a lot of settings in the menu. I also found the introduction easy to understand.

Graphically, it's very minimal and focuses on the text being shown. I think the system is meant to show what's possible in theory, but from my point of view there weren't that many dialogues with the three people, and not that many options either.

So it's a cool idea, but it didn't really grab me. As I said, though, text adventures and dialogue games aren't my favorite kind of games.

I would love to see the characters from the concept art in the game. That would bring the whole thing more to life.

I think the premise and concept are interesting, but I'm a bit lost when running through the gameplay.

If the goal of the game is to make the player manipulate the social relationships then I feel like the limit of 3 questions and then you're done with the date becomes really limiting in the available interactions you can have. If the goal of the game is to be a mystery-solving deduction game then I didn't encounter a lot of objective evidence about what happened during the crime to make good guesses. 

I played two full play-throughs. Trying to be flirtatious with my dialog ended up getting social interaction responses that didn't have anything to do with the crime, but being direct in my dialog got a lot of dead-end answers that didn't give me new information. Ideally I was looking for conflicting information between different people, but they all seemed to not want to say anything about the crime. 

I took a guess on Granny the first playthrough due to her inability to just answer questions about her project and her removal from the scene of the crime after a heated discussion with the victim, but the game seems to want me to believe that answer was wrong.

I took a guess on Steven the second time through primarily based on him being a jerk that didn't want to say anything other than "cooking is a woman's work", which avoids the actual conflict of the murder entirely. The game seems to want me to believe that answer was correct, but I didn't have any objective information that would incriminate him so I feel a bit of a hollow victory.