Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
I am aware that, on paper and in theory, this modus operandi is already in place

You talk inconsequential, like an ai. You make a suggestion to implement A and B and now claim, that you are aware that A and B are already in place. This makes no sense.

The proper suggestion is to improve A and B. What this change in the October update will hopefully have as a consequence.

As for your cp allegations for the sake of shock value in argument, I think I know what you talk about. And if you would have looked closer, instead of just citing headlines to make your argument look important, you would know that 1) the project was reported 2) the request already was forwarded to admins 3) the project is in quarantine, which brings me to 4) professionals already are handling the case. 

I believe my posts are clear. If you enjoy creating pointless controversy and using sophistry just to be right, which I have already noticed you like to do, that is a different story. I know a contrarian when I see one online. Nothing personal, but I do not particularly appreciate this kind of attitude.

You talk about shock value and bring up AI to implicitly accuse me of replying through a LLM. Now that is a subtle way to discredit the person you are talking to.

Regarding the issue I read about, it was definitely not resolved, as the thread remained open and unsolved. Therefore, it is likely a completely different case altogether, as I assume it is not the only one that has ever come up. Anyway, as I mentioned above, I am currently looking for the thread and will post it here if I find it.

Either way, I do not quite understand your stance. You yourself are aware that malware is rampant, you have written so repeatedly across multiple threads, and that stricter controls are needed. Yet, the moment I supported your own claim, you started arguing against me. Go figure.