our senses for tasting of food are not comparable to our ability to entertain ourselfs with "art"
Actually, that is the same. Apreciating good food is exactly the same as apreciating good art.
You are right, food is vital. But it is not vital that the food tastes good.
And making "shitty art" is rather performance art than art. Also, you should be able to make non-shitty art, before anyone believes you do it intentionally.
Excusing bad art with artistic expression is cheap. So is burning food or putting pineapples on pizza. Just because it's different and tastes strange, does not make it something worth of apreciation.
Is that what you are reading here? Seriously?
You can hate ai all you want, but please use correct statements and facts as the basis of your opinions. What's really messed up in the world is how people think that emotion is enough for reasoning and arguing a point.
And your analogy with the food and the art was just wrong. You argue against ai and use such a faulty comparision? You won't convince anyone with that. Or rather, you will show everyone that you have no argument. That your position is weak and that you are very likely wrong.
Apart from the insult, the cat had a valid point. The original post was edited 4 times, I am not sure what you replied to specifically IN ALL CAPS. But your point seemed to have been to just do bad art and call it an artistic expression. Which is a cheap excuse, in a "REALLY GOOD GAME". If that game is really good, the art will not be a low effort thing. It will either be fitting for the purpose, commissioned or some stock or free art. And nowadays maybe even gen ai in a hobby project. If it's a really good game, people will not care! Except if they specifically hate ai.
And yes, it is the same line of thinking as if you would just intentionally burn your food, if you are a bad cook. So you can call the burn marks your artistic expression, instead of admitting you are bad at cooking and ordering food or do a plain and unburned dish.
And to that you replied that food cannot be compared to art because we cannot appreciate it the same way as art. Which is demonstrably wrong.
humans will do worse without using AI
I do not understand the statement. Do you mean humans are capable of creating things that are very bad, without help of ai (Yes they can). Or is the meaning that the results with ai are better than without ai help? I tried translating it and I usually am fluent in English. But I do not know what you mean here.
In context you probably mean that humans are better off with using ai (or rather that people are saying this). Some people here seem to think this. I think they are overestimating ai. AI is an enabler in the case of hobby game development. And if it enabled them to create their hobby project, those developers certainly are faring better with using ai, than they would without.
In general, using ai for games is a bad idea. So as a professional, it is better to not use it. At least not for any creative process. Mundane tasks like coloring were mentioned. Spellchecking your code and asking for examples would be a good usage. Stuff that might be doable procedural, but is just trivial with ai, so the current best tool for the task is ai. But games are not vital as you said. We do not need function. We want good tasting food, sorry, entertaining indie games made by indie devs or big budget games, where there is little to no room for ai. We would rather see simple art than bland ai creations. So if you are a hobby dev using ai, you better put effort into it. Else it will not only be seen as ai slop, it will be slop.
