Thank you so much. I’m really glad you liked it. I chose HTML because I’m very familiar with it and I knew I could work much faster with it during a jam. I also put a lot of time and effort into the game so using something I already knew well let me spend more time polishing the movement and visuals and overall feel instead of learning a new engine. Most of the game is JavaScript and Canvas. The movement physics and stars and trails and effects and UI are all made through code. For this kind of focused 2D game I think HTML was a really good choice. Godot would probably make more sense for something much bigger or more complex. I also really liked seeing how far I could push one HTML file.

Thanks for the detailed feedback. I think there may have been a bit of a misunderstanding about the objective so I would really appreciate it if you reconsidered the rating after knowing how the game works. There are actually two game modes. In the first mode the main idea is freedom and creativity. You can simply enjoy flying and draw whatever shapes and paths you like through the stars. The score is there for players who want an extra challenge because it measures how efficient and optimized your route was. So you can focus on making a beautiful constellation or try to perfect your path. In the second mode the objective is completely different. You have to survive for as long as possible and earn the highest score you can. I was also a little surprised by the 3 out of 5 for creativity because the idea is not just drawing constellations. You are constantly moving and using gravity and slingshots around suns to physically shape your trajectory. About the audio I intentionally kept it very minimal because the game takes place in space and I felt that the sound of silence worked really well for the atmosphere and made the individual effects stand out more. Thanks again for playing and for taking the time to write such detailed feedback.

83.2142 is actually intentional lol. I like stupidly precise numbers and I thought puting the excact number instead of "around 80" would stand out. Apparently it did just maybe not in the way I expected.And yes I used AI while making the game. Ive never tried to hide that. But saying it's "99% AI with maybe a little human touch" just because you recognize a certain look is honestly a pretty unfair assumption. You can say the visuals feel AI-made,  you can dislike the game completely that's all fair feedback. But telling someone how much of their own game they actually made, how much effort they put into it, or how much they cared about it when you simply don't know that is a different thing. I spent a lot of time on this project because I genuinely wanted to make something I liked. AI was a tool I used during that process, not a measurement of how much I cared about the result. As for Starglass , I can't speak for other people's games. I can only tell you how I made mine. So criticism of the game is completely fine. I just think the "99% AI, little human touch" part goes beyond criticizing the game and starts making assumptions about the person behind it.

Thank you! I’m really glad you enjoyed both modes. The endless one is my favorite too. I thought about adding music but I liked the quiet space atmosphere. I still get your point though. Some subtle music could make it even better.

Thanks bro. Im really glad you liked the idea. Drawing in the sky with your own trajectory was one of the main things I wanted to make fun. Im also really happy you liked the slingshot. Thanks for playing

Thanks bro  Im really glad you enjoyed both modes. I wanted the game to be easy to pick up but I could have pushed the challenge a bit more. Thanks for playing and for the feedback