The AI(P) there is no middle ground, nor will there ever be, not while there continues to be shocking news about its abuse and the destructive power it entails (such as the case of Hugging Face hacked by agents, a component crisis, being one of the most energy-inefficient technologies, etc.).
Saying that AI(P) has helped you feels like saying that the mafia has helped you save your business (that's if you say that in front of anti-AI people).
Oh, what you're describing is more about artistic discrimination than giving a low rating for not making good art.
Regarding the profile pic of Belle Rivers, her name is Vanellope Von Schweetz (Wreck-It Ralph), and her game jam recommendation is based on a very reductionist view of the character, simply because she is a Disney Princess and especially because of her fan-service scene in RBTI.
What made Vanellope different from the rest of the princesses was that she doesn't come from any adaptation of any classic fairy tale, she comes from video games (which, by the way, are not exactly free of titles that use the aforementioned) and from the modern era, to the point of proclaiming herself "president".
Vanellope made me question how Disney uses the term "Princess" in all its products, and looking at her design and the theme of the movie made me think that maybe she shouldn't be a princess, much less a Disney one.
Do you know why Randy & Manilla exists? Because it's the work of a big fan who has strongly disagreed with how Disney treated the character (especially in RBTI).
But putting all that aside, it was eye-opening for me.
And don't you think that made up terms can also fall into the category of colloquialisms?
Do you know how many terms that were previously just made up ended up working for more widespread use over time?
By the way, don't demand that people stop using the new words they like to say, because sometimes it's a form of personal identity, a way to not feel the same as everyone else, and if that made up word happens to work for many people, your complaint will no longer be valid.
Nor should you blindly trust search engines if they don't give you the results you want, the same goes for AI.
It is not a colloquial term, if only you use that term.
P.S: But you and Belle have also mentioned AI(P), so I'm not the only one who said the word anymore, only the difference is that you will forget it very soon, but I won't.
Look, you're giving too much weight to colloquial terms or idioms whose meaning is sometimes the same.
The fact that a word isn't officially listed in dictionaries doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If someone says it, then it automatically exists; the only difference is that it doesn't become a social or institutional standard.
Some old things come back due to the nostalgia trend, although within specific niches (for example, vinyl records).
You say that AI(P) is the standard (it only started being from 2025) and is the majority.
But what happens when a technology superior to AI arrives?
Wouldn't you feel displaced and start complaining about why people are abandoning AI?
But the real important thing is it's more fun to build with AI. You can do more and do it faster and that lets you be creative.
That really depends on how you use it. AI(P) undeniably makes everything faster, but it doesn't necessarily make it more fun or more creative.
If you let AI do all the work for you, then there's no creativity on your part and it's more prone to its most common flaws like artifacts or hallucinations (despite its huge improvements), but if it's assisted for the difficult parts and you add your touch for the revision and where you do best, then there is some creativity.
What you're saying is almost a declaration of war on people who don't use AI(P) (or hardly at least) for their work, and you want it to be the dominant force just because it's the fastest and most efficient.
But there is one thing that AI(P) will never have: Human judgment, which is why in AI assisted there is still some human judgment.
Do you know why I call AI AI(P)? Because it is not a simulator of human intelligence, but an advanced information processor, they are predictive models that bring the most probable results instead of the most correct ones or the ones they really want.
It's the reason you used the AI just to assist and then they reviewed it to give your personal touch.
I could say that your entire long paragraph is assisted by AI(P), because on your own you wouldn't be able to create such a long text in such a short time.
AI-made & AI-slop aren't such separate entities and are correlated because they lack the quality of being assisted under human review.
By the way, it's a technology that has been standardized at the worst possible time, still a bubble about to burst and a major component crisis as a result.
