The Oregon Trail/60 Seconds inspired narrative expedition concept, rich shop/stat mechanics, and single-player social deduction loop fit the "Don't Trust" theme super creatively! Balancing crew stats while watching task logs to weed out the liars gives it a fantastic retro RPG atmosphere.

A few deduction logic, UI, and onboarding suggestions for post-jam updates:

- Deduction & RNG Logic: Right now, liar task failures feel a bit too random (e.g., successful characters turning out to be the liars). Grounding the logic closer to deterministic pass/fail rates will make uncovering the impostors feel more strategic and less like luck.

- Stat Abbreviations & Info UI: Make stat abbreviation tooltips and the tutorial/info buttons larger and higher contrast so players don't miss key stat definitions before sending crew on expeditions.

- Win Trigger & Trust Pacing: Fix the $10k money win-condition bug, and smooth out the trust decay rate so players have slightly more breathing room to test crew combinations without getting an instant game over.

Ambitious concept with great atmosphere and storytelling! If you get a free minute, I'd really appreciate your feedback and rating on my solo jam project as well: /jam/brackeys-16/rate/4953523

Nice game, i had some fun playing it !

Interesting idea and great presentation! I think its too difficult to discern what should happen if no one in a task is a liar and what should happen if one is a liar. I get why you can't just say "this task requires 10 str" because then it would make it too obvious. But right now it feels like the feedback is almost random. I think the idea might have been stronger if you had taken out all of the stats and instead relied on "pass/fail" for the tasks. Then add some randomness for if a character naturally passes or fails. It would I think at least be more discernible to the player and allow them to make that "kick" decision with a little more understanding. But still, good job, really liked the art and idea.

The liars was really hard to discern, but none the less the game was pretty fun got my brain thinking! 

It's a bit hard to win for me but I like the game

Interesting concept! Loved the shop and stats system, it was super hard to discern who lies and who doesn't. I'd suggest a more fleshed out expedition results screen.

It was a really interesting idea! I really enjoyed it. Simple, but with lots of details. Great job!

I enjoyed the game, but I would've liked the feed back from my actions to be a little clearer.

I loved the narration type expedition genre this game took. the art is simple and great. nice story telling. It felt abit more rng and can do well with balancing. Great job overall.

This is a really good game, and I had fun playing it! I love the concept, but it needs a bit of balancing. For example, during one run, knight and I failed to fight the monster, blacksmith failed to fix the wagon, but bard and navigator succeeded in collecting supplies. you'd expect the knight and blacksmith to be the liars after two rounds of failures, but the liars turned out to be the bard and navigator instead! It felt a bit confusing. Overall, a very good job, and good luck

I really liked the visuals and it's cool that your game is inspired by 60 seconds. I couldn't figure out what to do on day 1, as nothing popped up for me in the tasks and when I pressed skip, nothing happened. I really want to check out the game I just don't know how to progress.